|
Criteria |
Awesome
(25 points) |
Pretty Good
(22 Points) |
Almost there
(19 Points) |
Needs More
(17 Points) |
Score |
|
Journal |
Entries are complete, detailed and in-depth |
Entries for most sections with considerable detail |
Some entries included but contain very little detail |
Few entries and entries are vague |
|
|
Essay |
Contains detailed, organized, and clear information
about rainforests with well reasoned analysis and detail |
Contains clear and organized information about
rainforests with some reasoned analysis and detail |
Contains some information about rainforests with
little reasoned analysis or detail
May not be clear and organized |
Contains very little information about rainforests
with no reasoned analysis or detail
Unorganized and unclear |
|
|
Graphs |
All aspects of graphs are labeled and
concise—including graph title, x- & y-axis, etc.
Information is presented accurately. |
Most aspects of graphs are labeled and
concise—including graph title, x- & y-axis, etc.
Information is presented accurately. |
Some aspects of graphs are labeled and
concise—including graph title, x- & y-axis, etc.
Most information is presented accurately.
|
Few aspects of graphs are labeled and
concise—including graph title, x- & y-axis, etc.
Information is inaccurate or misrepresented.
|
|
|
Presentation |
Includes a detailed viable solution.
Includes 5 visuals with excellent commentary and
summary. Creative and neat.
|
Includes a detailed viable solution.
Includes 5 visuals with good commentary and summary.
Creative and neat.
|
Includes a detailed viable solution.
Includes 5 visuals with some commentary and summary.
Somewhat creative and neat.
|
Includes a detailed viable solution.
Includes 5 visuals with no commentary or summary.
Lacks neatness and creativity.
|
|